🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils is set to be cut by over 50%, after a divisive law change that forced local governments to submit the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include multiple elected officials based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to elect a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to establish a Māori ward by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, stating local residents ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish different wards – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to keep their wards.